top of page
< Back

Individual Flexibility Arrangements: the limits employers miss

IFAs are useful, but they have real legal limits. Most employers use them in ways the Fair Work Act does not actually permit.

An Individual Flexibility Arrangement (IFA) lets an employer and employee vary specified terms of a modern Award or enterprise agreement to suit individual circumstances. They are useful, but they are also frequently misused. This framework covers the five tests every IFA should pass before it goes into the file.

01

Are the terms you're varying actually variable under an IFA?

Which terms of an Award or EA can be varied by an IFA depends on the specific instrument. The flexibility clause sets the boundaries and not all terms are open to variation.

Where it goes wrong: an IFA that varies a term outside the flexibility clause. The arrangement is unenforceable and the underlying Award entitlement continues to apply.
02

Does the IFA leave the employee better off overall?

Whether an IFA passes the Better Off Overall Test depends on the substantive entitlements being traded, the way they have been calculated, and the employee's actual work pattern.

Where it goes wrong: an IFA that swaps cash for time, or penalty rates for a flat rate, without modelling the employee's actual hours. The BOOT can fail on cycles where the employee works more penalty time than assumed.
03

Is the IFA in writing and signed?

What form an IFA needs to take depends on the Award or EA, but the universal requirement is a signed written record of the arrangement specifying the terms being varied.

Where it goes wrong: a verbal understanding called an IFA. With no document and no signature, there is no IFA, and the underlying Award entitlement is what applies.
04

Can the employee terminate it on notice?

Termination provisions in an IFA depend on the Award or EA's specific requirements, but the employee must be able to terminate the arrangement on a reasonable period of notice.

Where it goes wrong: IFAs without an exit clause, or with an exit clause that locks the employee in beyond what the Award allows. The arrangement is not binding.
05

Is the IFA registered correctly?

What recordkeeping is required for IFAs depends on the Award or EA and any reporting obligations to Fair Work. At minimum, the signed arrangement should sit in the employee file and be accessible to the FWO if requested.

Where it goes wrong: IFAs sitting in the manager's drawer with no central register. When the FWO asks for them, the absence of a record is the problem.

Three things to watch for

1. "IFA" used to undercut the Award
An IFA cannot leave the employee worse off. If the maths shows a net reduction, the IFA is not valid.
2. Trading penalty rates for cash flat
A penalty-rate trade that doesn't account for the actual penalty hours worked typically fails the BOOT. Calculate properly.
3. No exit clause
Every IFA must let the employee terminate it on notice. No exit clause means the IFA is not enforceable.
IFAs are useful, but they have real legal limits. Most employers use them in ways the Fair Work Act does not actually permit.

FREE RESOURCE | HR & IR FRAMEWORKS

bottom of page